Hier das ganze Nummer der Studia Theologica Debrecinenis zum Thema: » Die öffentliche Relevanz von Schuld und Vergebung» darin auch meine Überlegungen zum Thema «Scham»
https://derep-k.drhe.hu/12/1/Studia_2012_kulonszam.pdf
‘Shame: A Systematic-Theological Approach’
The title of this article calls for some clarification: Why focus on ‘shame’ in particular? What makes it unique, and why examine emotions at all? For a long time, emotions were, and to some extent still are, neglected in theology and philosophy.
The first question to address is this: Can emotions—and ‘shame’ in particular—offer insights into the quality of human life? If the answer is yes, can we then assert that shame can reveal something unique about the Christian person, something that cannot be expressed from other perspectives?
This article begins by examining the theological relevance of shame through a lexicographical overview, followed by a conceptual clarification. It then situates the concept of shame within the broader discussion, referencing thinkers such as Zygmunt Bauman and Hans-Georg Geyer. Following this, shame is presented as a concept of profound theological significance. Drawing on Bonhoeffer, Giorgio Agamben, and with explicit reference to Avishai Margalit, the article demonstrates the relevance of shame for theological reflection. The main points are as follows:
- ‘Shame’ as an ontological category: Shame is both individual and socio-ethical in nature.
- Reconciliation: Theologically, shame can only be fully understood within the context of reconciliation, which allows for its adhortative (exhortative) function.
- Societal function: Shame serves as an indispensable brake for a functioning society, safeguarding it from the dominance of ‘biopower.’
- Secondary virtues: Shame highlights the importance of ‘secondary virtues’ and enhances human dignity through its exhortative nature.
- A marker of a ‘honest society’: Shame helps uphold the minimum conditions necessary for a ‘honest society.’
- An ethical-theological category: Shame transcends political discourse, providing moral and theological evaluations.
- Modern challenges: The ‘shame-forgetfulness’ of modern and postmodern societies has led to a relativization of values, undermining societal ethics.
- Humanity and shame: To remain truly human, individuals must retain the ability to feel shame. Without this capacity, humanity is diminished.
In conclusion, the article suggests that shame, as an ontological and theological category, reminds humanity of its dependence on God’s reconciling act. It argues that individuals are not self-sufficient but rather derive their identity as a response to God’s grace. Consequently, shame serves as a vital reminder of this dependence.
